Paul Cilliers (complexity) meeting with Mark McKergow, 14 May 2008 - SOLWorld2024-03-28T22:59:11Zhttp://solworld.ning.com/group/karlstadgroup/forum/topic/show?id=2102269%3ATopic%3A1465&feed=yes&xn_auth=noI don' think you are wrong. M…tag:solworld.ning.com,2008-05-20:2102269:Comment:19612008-05-20T17:36:18.759ZMark McKergowhttp://solworld.ning.com/profile/MarkMcKergow
I don' think you are wrong. Most people misunderstand the implications of complexity - they think it can be dealt with as if it was a normal analysable system. Bot lots of the usual strategies are closed off - leaving an SF approach as a the logical choice of what you can meaningfully do.
I don' think you are wrong. Most people misunderstand the implications of complexity - they think it can be dealt with as if it was a normal analysable system. Bot lots of the usual strategies are closed off - leaving an SF approach as a the logical choice of what you can meaningfully do. Hi Mark,
just read your inter…tag:solworld.ning.com,2008-05-20:2102269:Comment:18182008-05-20T07:38:31.421ZBart van Loonhttp://solworld.ning.com/profile/BartvanLoon
Hi Mark,<br />
just read your interesting notes on the meeting w/ paul cilliers.<br />
it seems that what where working at...... is only the beginning.<br />
it's the beginning of a great adventure!<br />
<br />
as for now, I'm confused about the direction the complexity theory and the systems theory are heading. Am I wrong that they are faltering at the practical implications? Any suggestions?<br />
<br />
Bart
Hi Mark,<br />
just read your interesting notes on the meeting w/ paul cilliers.<br />
it seems that what where working at...... is only the beginning.<br />
it's the beginning of a great adventure!<br />
<br />
as for now, I'm confused about the direction the complexity theory and the systems theory are heading. Am I wrong that they are faltering at the practical implications? Any suggestions?<br />
<br />
Bart